<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1000 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and treat the lease rental as &quot;income from business&quot; based on previous rulings and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Chennai Property and Investment Ltd. The issue was remanded back to the AO for further assessment, emphasizing consistency in treating rental income as business income in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 07:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1000 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify and treat the lease rental as &quot;income from business&quot; based on previous rulings and the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Chennai Property and Investment Ltd. The issue was remanded back to the AO for further assessment, emphasizing consistency in treating rental income as business income in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>