<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 978 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345866</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to claim cenvat credit on the outward freight service used for transporting goods for export. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s responsibility for delivering goods to the foreign buyer at the port of export, determining that all services up to the export of goods from that port should be treated as eligible for credit. Citing Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the Tribunal concluded that the outward freight service up to the port of export was admissible for credit, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 07:14:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 978 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345866</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to claim cenvat credit on the outward freight service used for transporting goods for export. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s responsibility for delivering goods to the foreign buyer at the port of export, determining that all services up to the export of goods from that port should be treated as eligible for credit. Citing Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the Tribunal concluded that the outward freight service up to the port of export was admissible for credit, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>