<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193429</link>
    <description>A transferee pendente lite acquires an interest during the pendency of proceedings, so the appropriate route is Order 22 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which permits continuation of the proceeding by or against the person on whom the interest has devolved with leave of the Court. Order 1 Rule 10, which concerns addition of necessary or proper parties, does not govern this specific situation of devolution of interest during litigation. The transferee may remain bound by the result even if not brought on record, but impleadment depends on leave under the correct provision. An application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 was therefore held not maintainable, and the refusal to implead was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:37:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1127 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193429</link>
      <description>A transferee pendente lite acquires an interest during the pendency of proceedings, so the appropriate route is Order 22 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which permits continuation of the proceeding by or against the person on whom the interest has devolved with leave of the Court. Order 1 Rule 10, which concerns addition of necessary or proper parties, does not govern this specific situation of devolution of interest during litigation. The transferee may remain bound by the result even if not brought on record, but impleadment depends on leave under the correct provision. An application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 was therefore held not maintainable, and the refusal to implead was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>