https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193424 A transfer of accrued profits from land, when incidental to and connected with a transfer of the land itself, is not a transfer of a mere right to sue and therefore is not barred by Section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act. The court distinguished a bare cause of action from a claim to past profits annexed to proprietary enjoyment, and held that the latter is enforceable. On quantum, the findings that the alleged oral agreement for 4,000 cocoanuts was not proved and that Rs. 375 was fair compensation were findings of fact not open to interference in second appeal, so the trial court's decree was restored. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:23:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193424 A transfer of accrued profits from land, when incidental to and connected with a transfer of the land itself, is not a transfer of a mere right to sue and therefore is not barred by Section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act. The court distinguished a bare cause of action from a claim to past profits annexed to proprietary enjoyment, and held that the latter is enforceable. On quantum, the findings that the alleged oral agreement for 4,000 cocoanuts was not proved and that Rs. 375 was fair compensation were findings of fact not open to interference in second appeal, so the trial court's decree was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193424