<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 716 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193419</link>
    <description>A registered sale deed is treated as an outright conveyance where its recitals show a completed sale for consideration and delivery of possession. A party alleging that the document was only collateral security for a loan, or otherwise sham or colourable, must prove that plea with clear and cogent evidence; oral evidence and surrounding circumstances may be considered, but the burden remains heavy. On the facts described, the defendant failed to displace the conveyance through revenue entries, possession disputes, or Section 145 CrPC proceedings, while the plaintiff established title through the registered deed and supporting evidence. The title-based claim for possession was therefore upheld and the decree left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 716 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193419</link>
      <description>A registered sale deed is treated as an outright conveyance where its recitals show a completed sale for consideration and delivery of possession. A party alleging that the document was only collateral security for a loan, or otherwise sham or colourable, must prove that plea with clear and cogent evidence; oral evidence and surrounding circumstances may be considered, but the burden remains heavy. On the facts described, the defendant failed to displace the conveyance through revenue entries, possession disputes, or Section 145 CrPC proceedings, while the plaintiff established title through the registered deed and supporting evidence. The title-based claim for possession was therefore upheld and the decree left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>