https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193417 Promotion from Technologist Grade II to Technologist Grade I was required to be treated cadre-wise because the governing statute, 1967 Rules and Regulations, appointment terms, and actual service practice showed a common transferable cadre rather than separate section-wise units. An employee's posting in a particular section could not lawfully defeat consideration for promotion when incumbents moved across sections and common seniority was maintained. Promotions made on a section-wise basis were therefore vulnerable where they excluded eligible employees without a clear statutory basis. The stated principle is that promotional consideration cannot be confined to the employee's initial section posting unless an express rule authorises that restriction. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:12:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193417 Promotion from Technologist Grade II to Technologist Grade I was required to be treated cadre-wise because the governing statute, 1967 Rules and Regulations, appointment terms, and actual service practice showed a common transferable cadre rather than separate section-wise units. An employee's posting in a particular section could not lawfully defeat consideration for promotion when incumbents moved across sections and common seniority was maintained. Promotions made on a section-wise basis were therefore vulnerable where they excluded eligible employees without a clear statutory basis. The stated principle is that promotional consideration cannot be confined to the employee's initial section posting unless an express rule authorises that restriction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193417