<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 967 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345855</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued for re-opening the assessment for AY 2003-04 under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The reasons provided by the AO did not meet the legal requirements for re-opening, as there was no failure by the Assessee to fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The court emphasized that re-opening should not be based on a mere change of opinion and must clearly indicate the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 967 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345855</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued for re-opening the assessment for AY 2003-04 under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The reasons provided by the AO did not meet the legal requirements for re-opening, as there was no failure by the Assessee to fully disclose material facts necessary for assessment. The court emphasized that re-opening should not be based on a mere change of opinion and must clearly indicate the Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>