<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 957 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345845</link>
    <description>The HC held that Section 68 was not applicable to amounts representing purchases made on credit, as these were genuine supply transactions. The Tribunal had already found that the provisions of Section 68 did not attract the credited sums in question. Since trade creditors for earlier assessment years were accepted in scrutiny assessments, the genuineness of the expenses could not be doubted. The court ruled against the revenue, affirming that the additions under Section 68 were not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 957 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345845</link>
      <description>The HC held that Section 68 was not applicable to amounts representing purchases made on credit, as these were genuine supply transactions. The Tribunal had already found that the provisions of Section 68 did not attract the credited sums in question. Since trade creditors for earlier assessment years were accepted in scrutiny assessments, the genuineness of the expenses could not be doubted. The court ruled against the revenue, affirming that the additions under Section 68 were not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>