<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 956 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345844</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IA, allowing the claim to be made in both original and revised returns. The court affirmed the assessee&#039;s classification as a developer instead of a contractor, based on detailed findings and legal positions presented by the CIT (A) and Tribunal. The appeal challenging these decisions was dismissed, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 956 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345844</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IA, allowing the claim to be made in both original and revised returns. The court affirmed the assessee&#039;s classification as a developer instead of a contractor, based on detailed findings and legal positions presented by the CIT (A) and Tribunal. The appeal challenging these decisions was dismissed, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>