<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345840</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and directed the Assessing Officer to adjust the depreciation calculation. The Tribunal held that the subsidy received, aimed at encouraging industrial development and not tied to specific fixed assets, should not be deducted from the actual cost of assets for depreciation purposes. This decision clarified the application of Explanation 10 of Section 43(1) in cases involving subsidies for industrial development.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345840</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, and directed the Assessing Officer to adjust the depreciation calculation. The Tribunal held that the subsidy received, aimed at encouraging industrial development and not tied to specific fixed assets, should not be deducted from the actual cost of assets for depreciation purposes. This decision clarified the application of Explanation 10 of Section 43(1) in cases involving subsidies for industrial development.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>