<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 946 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding them eligible for abatement under Notification No.1/2006-ST. It was determined that the inclusion of free supplied material in the valuation of taxable service was not necessary. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order based on established legal principles and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 946 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding them eligible for abatement under Notification No.1/2006-ST. It was determined that the inclusion of free supplied material in the valuation of taxable service was not necessary. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order based on established legal principles and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>