<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Claims Should Not Be Dismissed for Export Warehouse Portion, Says Appellants to Central Excise Commissioner.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35630</link>
    <description>Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund claims to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacturer. The said refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground that a part of the refund related to the warehouse of the exporter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:05:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Claims Should Not Be Dismissed for Export Warehouse Portion, Says Appellants to Central Excise Commissioner.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35630</link>
      <description>Refund claim - jurisdiction - the appellants filed the refund claims to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacturer. The said refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground that a part of the refund related to the warehouse of the exporter.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:05:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>