<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (7) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9301</link>
    <description>Agricultural income-tax exemption under section 10 turned on the extent of agricultural land held, not merely the area cultivated in the assessment year; because the assessee held land beyond the exempt limit, the exemption was unavailable. Land planted with elephant grass as a regular fodder crop was not land used exclusively for pasture under section 2(nnn), as pasture contemplates spontaneous herbage grazed upon, not cultivated fodder. Crop-based agricultural income could also be estimated and taxed even where produce was consumed in the assessee&#039;s own dairy operations and no local market existed, since value could still be assessed and the adopted rate was not shown to be excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (7) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9301</link>
      <description>Agricultural income-tax exemption under section 10 turned on the extent of agricultural land held, not merely the area cultivated in the assessment year; because the assessee held land beyond the exempt limit, the exemption was unavailable. Land planted with elephant grass as a regular fodder crop was not land used exclusively for pasture under section 2(nnn), as pasture contemplates spontaneous herbage grazed upon, not cultivated fodder. Crop-based agricultural income could also be estimated and taxed even where produce was consumed in the assessee&#039;s own dairy operations and no local market existed, since value could still be assessed and the adopted rate was not shown to be excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>