<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1143 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193395</link>
    <description>A town planning scheme under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 is a distinct statutory mechanism from a development plan, and lapse of a reservation under Section 20(2) does not bar inclusion of the same land in a scheme under Section 40. Section 40(3)(jj)(a) was explained as regulating the distribution of land and funding within the scheme, not effecting an acquisition without authority of law, and the compensation framework was upheld against constitutional challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 300-A. A challenge to a draft-stage resolution and scheme was also treated as premature because the statutory process still allowed objections and further remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1143 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193395</link>
      <description>A town planning scheme under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 is a distinct statutory mechanism from a development plan, and lapse of a reservation under Section 20(2) does not bar inclusion of the same land in a scheme under Section 40. Section 40(3)(jj)(a) was explained as regulating the distribution of land and funding within the scheme, not effecting an acquisition without authority of law, and the compensation framework was upheld against constitutional challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 300-A. A challenge to a draft-stage resolution and scheme was also treated as premature because the statutory process still allowed objections and further remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>