<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193397</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, affirming the deductions allowed for the respondent-Club&#039;s rateable value assessment under Section 154 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the net rateable value may differ from the actual rent paid, and upheld the various expenses claimed by the Club as necessary for determining the correct rateable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193397</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment, affirming the deductions allowed for the respondent-Club&#039;s rateable value assessment under Section 154 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the net rateable value may differ from the actual rent paid, and upheld the various expenses claimed by the Club as necessary for determining the correct rateable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>