<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi upheld deletion of the addition for US business income because the income arose through a permanent establishment in the USA, tax had already been paid there, and treaty relief with foreign tax credit principles barred double taxation in India. It also held that the foreign travel expense disallowance could not stand where the bills were supported and no personal use or excessiveness was shown. Expenditure on microwave, mobile phone and similar items was treated as revenue spending, as the items were purchased as festival gifts for clients and did not create a capital asset. The section 40A(3) disallowance for club payment was deleted because the payment was made by cheque and was explained as business expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi upheld deletion of the addition for US business income because the income arose through a permanent establishment in the USA, tax had already been paid there, and treaty relief with foreign tax credit principles barred double taxation in India. It also held that the foreign travel expense disallowance could not stand where the bills were supported and no personal use or excessiveness was shown. Expenditure on microwave, mobile phone and similar items was treated as revenue spending, as the items were purchased as festival gifts for clients and did not create a capital asset. The section 40A(3) disallowance for club payment was deleted because the payment was made by cheque and was explained as business expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>