<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer in all issues raised by the Revenue. The Tribunal found that the taxpayer was entitled to protection from double taxation on income earned in a foreign country, expenses were justified, and payments were made legitimately. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer in all issues raised by the Revenue. The Tribunal found that the taxpayer was entitled to protection from double taxation on income earned in a foreign country, expenses were justified, and payments were made legitimately. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>