<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345800</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in a bank account are added only to the extent they remain unexplained, and substantiated agricultural receipts must be given credit; here, the explained portion was accepted and the addition was sustained only for the balance. Where an undisclosed bank account shows both deposits and withdrawals, the movement of funds indicates recycling, so the proper basis for taxation is peak credit rather than taxing each deposit in full; that approach was upheld for the PNB account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:14:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 912 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345800</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in a bank account are added only to the extent they remain unexplained, and substantiated agricultural receipts must be given credit; here, the explained portion was accepted and the addition was sustained only for the balance. Where an undisclosed bank account shows both deposits and withdrawals, the movement of funds indicates recycling, so the proper basis for taxation is peak credit rather than taxing each deposit in full; that approach was upheld for the PNB account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>