<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on certain points but remanding the issue of the cost of construction and the unexplained Rs. 25 lakhs back to the CIT(A) for further verification. The Tribunal emphasized the need for actual cost verification and proper examination of the sources of funds. The order was pronounced on 22/03/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:14:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on certain points but remanding the issue of the cost of construction and the unexplained Rs. 25 lakhs back to the CIT(A) for further verification. The Tribunal emphasized the need for actual cost verification and proper examination of the sources of funds. The order was pronounced on 22/03/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>