<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 907 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345795</link>
    <description>In transfer pricing for marketing support services, comparables must be functionally similar to the tested party. Agrima Consultants International Ltd. was treated as a suitable comparable because it matched the service profile, while IDC India Ltd. was excluded for being engaged in knowledge process outsourcing and Empire Industries Ltd. was excluded for deriving income from manufacturing, trading and indenting activities. The comparable set was therefore to be reworked and the arm&#039;s length price recomputed. The transfer pricing adjustment would not survive if the revised mean operating margin placed the assessee within the permissible arm&#039;s length range.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 907 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345795</link>
      <description>In transfer pricing for marketing support services, comparables must be functionally similar to the tested party. Agrima Consultants International Ltd. was treated as a suitable comparable because it matched the service profile, while IDC India Ltd. was excluded for being engaged in knowledge process outsourcing and Empire Industries Ltd. was excluded for deriving income from manufacturing, trading and indenting activities. The comparable set was therefore to be reworked and the arm&#039;s length price recomputed. The transfer pricing adjustment would not survive if the revised mean operating margin placed the assessee within the permissible arm&#039;s length range.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>