<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 900 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed one appeal and partly allowed another, setting aside findings related to the jurisdiction of the warehouse. It directed a thorough review of the refund claim on its merits, emphasizing compliance with mandatory conditions for duty payment and export of goods. The Tribunal held that procedural rules should not be construed as mandatory if fundamental requirements are met, instructing the Adjudicating Authority to process the claim without technical infractions mentioned in lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 900 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed one appeal and partly allowed another, setting aside findings related to the jurisdiction of the warehouse. It directed a thorough review of the refund claim on its merits, emphasizing compliance with mandatory conditions for duty payment and export of goods. The Tribunal held that procedural rules should not be construed as mandatory if fundamental requirements are met, instructing the Adjudicating Authority to process the claim without technical infractions mentioned in lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>