<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 885 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay duty on the scrap of capital goods as it was generated in the manufacturing process, not manufactured by them. Additionally, excise duty was not leviable on the spent Zinc Oxide Catalyst as it did not amount to a new product during the manufacturing process. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 885 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants were not liable to pay duty on the scrap of capital goods as it was generated in the manufacturing process, not manufactured by them. Additionally, excise duty was not leviable on the spent Zinc Oxide Catalyst as it did not amount to a new product during the manufacturing process. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>