https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345772 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, against the rejection of CENVAT credit on furnace oil by the Commissioner (A). The appellant successfully argued that the rejection was contrary to Board Circulars and previous tribunal judgments, asserting that the credit was rightfully availed based on valid invoices. The judicial member found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and providing necessary relief. The appeal outcome was pronounced on 13/06/2017. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:12:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345772 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, against the rejection of CENVAT credit on furnace oil by the Commissioner (A). The appellant successfully argued that the rejection was contrary to Board Circulars and previous tribunal judgments, asserting that the credit was rightfully availed based on valid invoices. The judicial member found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and providing necessary relief. The appeal outcome was pronounced on 13/06/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345772