<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345766</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging assessment orders under the TNGST Act and CST Act for 2001-02 &amp;amp; 2002-03. The court found that the assessment conducted without providing an opportunity for cross-examination and perusal of documents violated natural justice principles. Relying on a previous judgment emphasizing the importance of affording such opportunities, the court set aside the impugned orders and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter, providing necessary documents for cross-examination. The petitioner&#039;s request for copies of statements and cross-examination was upheld, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 878 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345766</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition challenging assessment orders under the TNGST Act and CST Act for 2001-02 &amp;amp; 2002-03. The court found that the assessment conducted without providing an opportunity for cross-examination and perusal of documents violated natural justice principles. Relying on a previous judgment emphasizing the importance of affording such opportunities, the court set aside the impugned orders and directed the respondent to reconsider the matter, providing necessary documents for cross-examination. The petitioner&#039;s request for copies of statements and cross-examination was upheld, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>