https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9281 Where the revenue asserts that property standing in a trust's name belongs to a defaulting assessee, the Tax Recovery Officer may proceed with attachment on that basis, while the ostensible owner must pursue the statutory objection procedure under the Second Schedule or a civil suit. The ownership dispute is a factual issue not suitable for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226. A direction requiring attached debtors to deposit amounts into the Government Treasury under the income-tax recovery process was also within jurisdiction, with refund available if the attachment is later displaced in appropriate proceedings. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9281 Where the revenue asserts that property standing in a trust's name belongs to a defaulting assessee, the Tax Recovery Officer may proceed with attachment on that basis, while the ostensible owner must pursue the statutory objection procedure under the Second Schedule or a civil suit. The ownership dispute is a factual issue not suitable for determination in writ proceedings under Article 226. A direction requiring attached debtors to deposit amounts into the Government Treasury under the income-tax recovery process was also within jurisdiction, with refund available if the attachment is later displaced in appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9281