https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the orders dated 6.4.2011 and 8.4.2011. The petitioner was entitled to retain the land under the 1987 order, with the respondents restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession. Costs were imposed on specific officials, to be deducted from their salaries, and entries made in their service records. en-us Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:59:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the orders dated 6.4.2011 and 8.4.2011. The petitioner was entitled to retain the land under the 1987 order, with the respondents restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession. Costs were imposed on specific officials, to be deducted from their salaries, and entries made in their service records. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387