https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387 A long-settled consolidation allotment made in public interest could not be reopened after nearly 23 years without fraud, misrepresentation or another legally recognised ground for review, and any such recall had to comply with natural justice; the ex parte recall orders were therefore invalid. The Court also upheld the 1987 allotment made in exchange for the petitioner's original holding, noting the absence of fraud, collusion or patent lack of jurisdiction, the State's failure to show an equivalent alternative land, and the petitioner's lawful conduct. Estoppel, acquiescence and legitimate expectation operated against the State, and the petitioner's possession and revenue entries were protected. en-us Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:59:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387 A long-settled consolidation allotment made in public interest could not be reopened after nearly 23 years without fraud, misrepresentation or another legally recognised ground for review, and any such recall had to comply with natural justice; the ex parte recall orders were therefore invalid. The Court also upheld the 1987 allotment made in exchange for the petitioner's original holding, noting the absence of fraud, collusion or patent lack of jurisdiction, the State's failure to show an equivalent alternative land, and the petitioner's lawful conduct. Estoppel, acquiescence and legitimate expectation operated against the State, and the petitioner's possession and revenue entries were protected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193387