<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 922 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193383</link>
    <description>Penalty orders under Chapter XXI for delay in filing Annual Information Returns were held not appealable to the Tribunal because the statutory scheme did not confer jurisdiction on it. The proper appellate forum was the Commissioner (Appeals), since the Income-tax Act specifically permits an appeal against such penalty orders to that authority. As a result, the Tribunal declined to entertain the appeals and accepted the jurisdictional objection, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 922 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193383</link>
      <description>Penalty orders under Chapter XXI for delay in filing Annual Information Returns were held not appealable to the Tribunal because the statutory scheme did not confer jurisdiction on it. The proper appellate forum was the Commissioner (Appeals), since the Income-tax Act specifically permits an appeal against such penalty orders to that authority. As a result, the Tribunal declined to entertain the appeals and accepted the jurisdictional objection, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>