https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193378 Bona fide landlord requirement was upheld where family need, limited accommodation, and comparative hardship supported eviction; the tenant's claim of an available alternative was unconvincing, and partial eviction was found impractical. A separate ground based on acquisition of suitable alternative premises failed because there was no clear proof that the tenant had constructed premises fit for the same engineering business. Belated requests to amend objections and adduce additional evidence were rejected for inconsistency with the existing record and lack of due diligence. The trial court's common order was left undisturbed, with eviction sustained on the bona fide requirement ground and denied on the alternative accommodation ground. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:36:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193378 Bona fide landlord requirement was upheld where family need, limited accommodation, and comparative hardship supported eviction; the tenant's claim of an available alternative was unconvincing, and partial eviction was found impractical. A separate ground based on acquisition of suitable alternative premises failed because there was no clear proof that the tenant had constructed premises fit for the same engineering business. Belated requests to amend objections and adduce additional evidence were rejected for inconsistency with the existing record and lack of due diligence. The trial court's common order was left undisturbed, with eviction sustained on the bona fide requirement ground and denied on the alternative accommodation ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193378