<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1054 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193377</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The Court agreed that the unexplained cash credits were disclosed in the regular books of accounts and found no fault with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Court noted that the commission was part of the total amount allowed by the Assessing Officer and could not be disallowed. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1054 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193377</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal and CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The Court agreed that the unexplained cash credits were disclosed in the regular books of accounts and found no fault with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Court noted that the commission was part of the total amount allowed by the Assessing Officer and could not be disallowed. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>