https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193372 Review was unavailable under the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949 because neither the Act nor the rules conferred a review power. The court treated review as a statutory power, not an inherent one, and held that it could be exercised only when expressly provided. It further held that the Code of Civil Procedure did not generally apply to proceedings under this self-contained special enactment, and that Section 141 did not extend the entire Code, including Order 47 Rule 1, to such proceedings. The review application therefore did not lie. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:08:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193372 Review was unavailable under the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949 because neither the Act nor the rules conferred a review power. The court treated review as a statutory power, not an inherent one, and held that it could be exercised only when expressly provided. It further held that the Code of Civil Procedure did not generally apply to proceedings under this self-contained special enactment, and that Section 141 did not extend the entire Code, including Order 47 Rule 1, to such proceedings. The review application therefore did not lie. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jul 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193372