<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1089 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193360</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, finding the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 invalid. The A.O. had thoroughly examined the finance charges claim and MBB Transactions, leading to the conclusion that the CIT&#039;s order was not justified. The ITAT emphasized the importance of a comprehensive examination by the A.O. and the necessity of valid grounds to set aside assessment orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1089 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193360</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, finding the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 invalid. The A.O. had thoroughly examined the finance charges claim and MBB Transactions, leading to the conclusion that the CIT&#039;s order was not justified. The ITAT emphasized the importance of a comprehensive examination by the A.O. and the necessity of valid grounds to set aside assessment orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>