<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 870 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345758</link>
    <description>HC allowed the appeal, holding the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting an addition under s.69A after deleting the addition under s.68. The Tribunal&#039;s power to pass orders is confined to questions raised in the appeal; it cannot adjudicate issues beyond the subject matter before it. Because the Tribunal found the s.68 addition unsustainable but then made a new addition under s.69A, its order was vitiated. The decision restored relief to the assessee, ruling the Tribunal was not competent to make the s.69A addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 870 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345758</link>
      <description>HC allowed the appeal, holding the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting an addition under s.69A after deleting the addition under s.68. The Tribunal&#039;s power to pass orders is confined to questions raised in the appeal; it cannot adjudicate issues beyond the subject matter before it. Because the Tribunal found the s.68 addition unsustainable but then made a new addition under s.69A, its order was vitiated. The decision restored relief to the assessee, ruling the Tribunal was not competent to make the s.69A addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>