https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345737 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the application of the doctrine of merger in the case. It held that the review of a non-existent adjudication order and the subsequent impugned order were against the doctrine of merger. Referring to precedent, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order disallowing cenvat credit was not valid and set it aside. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345737 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the application of the doctrine of merger in the case. It held that the review of a non-existent adjudication order and the subsequent impugned order were against the doctrine of merger. Referring to precedent, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order disallowing cenvat credit was not valid and set it aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345737