https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345728 The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's findings, dismissing the department's appeal due to lack of corroborative evidence supporting allegations of under-valuation, unaccounted procurement, and clandestine clearance by KLR. The tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence, granting the benefit of doubt to the assessee as the charges against KLR were not proven. en-us Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345728 The tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's findings, dismissing the department's appeal due to lack of corroborative evidence supporting allegations of under-valuation, unaccounted procurement, and clandestine clearance by KLR. The tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence, granting the benefit of doubt to the assessee as the charges against KLR were not proven. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345728