https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345722 Goods covered by the shipping bills were treated as indistinguishable from consignments in earlier writ proceedings, where provisional release had already been directed on specified conditions. Because those earlier directions had neither been stayed nor modified, and the Revenue had complied with them in identical matters, no basis was shown for differential treatment. The petitioners were therefore entitled to provisional release of the goods, subject to the same conditions imposed in the earlier orders. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 08:13:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345722 Goods covered by the shipping bills were treated as indistinguishable from consignments in earlier writ proceedings, where provisional release had already been directed on specified conditions. Because those earlier directions had neither been stayed nor modified, and the Revenue had complied with them in identical matters, no basis was shown for differential treatment. The petitioners were therefore entitled to provisional release of the goods, subject to the same conditions imposed in the earlier orders. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345722