<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 106 - High Court Of Allahabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193348</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme for revising electricity rates under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, read with the Sixth Schedule, allowed the licensee to revise charges through the prescribed procedure and within the reasonable return ceiling. The invalidity of the State Government&#039;s separate notification did not defeat the revision, because the enhancement rested on an independent statutory source. The scheme was held to be complete, with notice confined to specified authorities and no implied right of prior consumer notice or hearing. An objection to the manner of swearing one petition was also accepted, supporting rejection of the writ petitions with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 106 - High Court Of Allahabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193348</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme for revising electricity rates under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, read with the Sixth Schedule, allowed the licensee to revise charges through the prescribed procedure and within the reasonable return ceiling. The invalidity of the State Government&#039;s separate notification did not defeat the revision, because the enhancement rested on an independent statutory source. The scheme was held to be complete, with notice confined to specified authorities and no implied right of prior consumer notice or hearing. An objection to the manner of swearing one petition was also accepted, supporting rejection of the writ petitions with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>