<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 823 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345711</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arises. The court found no misapplication of settled legal principles in estimating profit additions for certain projects. The additions were made without scrutiny or rejection of the Books of Accounts, a fact conceded by the Revenue before the ITAT. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 823 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345711</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arises. The court found no misapplication of settled legal principles in estimating profit additions for certain projects. The additions were made without scrutiny or rejection of the Books of Accounts, a fact conceded by the Revenue before the ITAT. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>