<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 816 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345704</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of supporting manufacturers in a case challenging notices issued by the Revenue under Section 147. The court found that the supporting manufacturers were entitled to a deduction under Section 80HHC based on the eligibility of the export house, Allana Sons Ltd., for the deduction. The court quashed the notices, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and the retrospective application of statutory provisions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 816 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345704</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of supporting manufacturers in a case challenging notices issued by the Revenue under Section 147. The court found that the supporting manufacturers were entitled to a deduction under Section 80HHC based on the eligibility of the export house, Allana Sons Ltd., for the deduction. The court quashed the notices, emphasizing the importance of legal precedents and the retrospective application of statutory provisions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>