https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9238 The court allowed the writ petition in part, quashing the notices and recorded statement of an individual, directing the return of account books and documents to the petitioner-firm, except for disputed loose sheets. The court noted conflicting evidence on ownership of the loose sheets and clarified that even if seizure procedures were flawed, authorities could still use obtained materials. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. en-us Tue, 28 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9238 The court allowed the writ petition in part, quashing the notices and recorded statement of an individual, directing the return of account books and documents to the petitioner-firm, except for disputed loose sheets. The court noted conflicting evidence on ownership of the loose sheets and clarified that even if seizure procedures were flawed, authorities could still use obtained materials. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9238