<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 794 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345682</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding alleged evasion of central excise duty by a manufacturer of re-rolled iron and steel products. The tribunal found no evidence linking the respondent to clandestine manufacturing or clearance activities. Despite contentions based on statements from the supplier&#039;s Managing Director, the tribunal emphasized the lack of tangible proof connecting the respondent to clandestine activities. The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, highlighting the necessity for concrete evidence in cases of clandestine removals. Consequently, the tribunal affirmed the correctness and legality of the impugned order, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 794 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345682</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding alleged evasion of central excise duty by a manufacturer of re-rolled iron and steel products. The tribunal found no evidence linking the respondent to clandestine manufacturing or clearance activities. Despite contentions based on statements from the supplier&#039;s Managing Director, the tribunal emphasized the lack of tangible proof connecting the respondent to clandestine activities. The tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, highlighting the necessity for concrete evidence in cases of clandestine removals. Consequently, the tribunal affirmed the correctness and legality of the impugned order, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>