<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 790 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal analyzed the manufacturing process and legal provisions to classify the appellant&#039;s products under chapter heading 7216.20 of the Tariff Act. By determining that the goods were not prepared for structural use under chapter 73.08, the Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of manufacturing processes and statutory interpretations in duty classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 790 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal analyzed the manufacturing process and legal provisions to classify the appellant&#039;s products under chapter heading 7216.20 of the Tariff Act. By determining that the goods were not prepared for structural use under chapter 73.08, the Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the significance of manufacturing processes and statutory interpretations in duty classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>