<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1236 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193335</link>
    <description>The ITAT Lucknow dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A) orders for assessment years 2007-08 &amp;amp; 2008-09. The judgment emphasized the impermissibility of reopening assessments based on a mere change of opinion without new relevant material, as outlined in CIT vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. Both parties agreed that the facts for both assessment years were identical, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1236 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193335</link>
      <description>The ITAT Lucknow dismissed both appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A) orders for assessment years 2007-08 &amp;amp; 2008-09. The judgment emphasized the impermissibility of reopening assessments based on a mere change of opinion without new relevant material, as outlined in CIT vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. Both parties agreed that the facts for both assessment years were identical, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>