<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 68,70,937. The technical fees were deemed revenue expenditure, supported by the tripartite agreement, and the allocation of head office expenses for section 80IB deduction was considered justified and consistent. The reassessment proceedings were deemed unwarranted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1062 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 68,70,937. The technical fees were deemed revenue expenditure, supported by the tripartite agreement, and the allocation of head office expenses for section 80IB deduction was considered justified and consistent. The reassessment proceedings were deemed unwarranted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>