<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of chemical solvents, in a case concerning refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules for clearances made to 100% EOUs. The Tribunal held that clearances to 100% EOUs should be treated as exports for the purpose of Rule 5 refund, overturning the rejection of the refund by the Commissioner (Appeals). Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible for the refund, and the impugned orders rejecting the refund were set aside, with the appeals allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of chemical solvents, in a case concerning refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules for clearances made to 100% EOUs. The Tribunal held that clearances to 100% EOUs should be treated as exports for the purpose of Rule 5 refund, overturning the rejection of the refund by the Commissioner (Appeals). Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible for the refund, and the impugned orders rejecting the refund were set aside, with the appeals allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>