<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</link>
    <description>Clearances to a 100% export oriented unit are treated as exports for the purpose of refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. A refund claim cannot be rejected merely because the supplies were not physical exports, where settled decisions recognise such clearances as export equivalent for refund purposes. Applying that position, the rejection of refund was unsustainable and the assessee was held entitled to refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1409 - CESTAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</link>
      <description>Clearances to a 100% export oriented unit are treated as exports for the purpose of refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. A refund claim cannot be rejected merely because the supplies were not physical exports, where settled decisions recognise such clearances as export equivalent for refund purposes. Applying that position, the rejection of refund was unsustainable and the assessee was held entitled to refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>