<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193329</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the recovery of the balance price of goods was dismissed by the court. The appellants/defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 10,30,016.97p with interest. The court held that the appellants/defendants were not entitled to raise debit notes for adjustments, as they were unrelated to the transactions in question. Additionally, claims regarding air freight charges and rate differences were not substantiated with evidence. The court concluded that the primary documents presented were sufficient to prove the transactions, and the appellants/defendants failed to provide adequate proof to support their claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1465 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193329</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the recovery of the balance price of goods was dismissed by the court. The appellants/defendants were ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 10,30,016.97p with interest. The court held that the appellants/defendants were not entitled to raise debit notes for adjustments, as they were unrelated to the transactions in question. Additionally, claims regarding air freight charges and rate differences were not substantiated with evidence. The court concluded that the primary documents presented were sufficient to prove the transactions, and the appellants/defendants failed to provide adequate proof to support their claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>