<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (3) TMI 44 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193328</link>
    <description>Section 33B revisional power was confined to situations where the revenue had no effective appellate remedy. Because the assessee&#039;s appeal against the assessment order was already pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the department could raise the same objection in that forum, including the registration issue. The Commissioner could not use revisional jurisdiction to bypass the ordinary appellate process already in motion, and the revisional order was therefore invalid for want of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (3) TMI 44 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193328</link>
      <description>Section 33B revisional power was confined to situations where the revenue had no effective appellate remedy. Because the assessee&#039;s appeal against the assessment order was already pending before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the department could raise the same objection in that forum, including the registration issue. The Commissioner could not use revisional jurisdiction to bypass the ordinary appellate process already in motion, and the revisional order was therefore invalid for want of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>