<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9231</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that drawings and patterns are considered &quot;plant&quot; under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee is entitled to depreciation on these assets, as they were found to have enduring utility and formed the basis of the manufacturing business. The court concluded in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9231</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that drawings and patterns are considered &quot;plant&quot; under section 32 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee is entitled to depreciation on these assets, as they were found to have enduring utility and formed the basis of the manufacturing business. The court concluded in favor of the assessee, directing the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>