https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320 The court affirmed the plaintiff's half-ownership of a truck based on an affidavit and contributions to the purchase, despite the registration certificate listing the defendant as the sole owner. It was held that the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 applied to the sale of motor vehicles, emphasizing that ownership transfer is not contingent upon registration under the Motor Vehicles Act. The court ruled that failure to update registration does not invalidate ownership transfer, dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower courts' decision in favor of the plaintiff. en-us Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:29:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320 The court affirmed the plaintiff's half-ownership of a truck based on an affidavit and contributions to the purchase, despite the registration certificate listing the defendant as the sole owner. It was held that the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 applied to the sale of motor vehicles, emphasizing that ownership transfer is not contingent upon registration under the Motor Vehicles Act. The court ruled that failure to update registration does not invalidate ownership transfer, dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower courts' decision in favor of the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320