<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 949 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320</link>
    <description>Ownership of a motor vehicle can pass by sale agreement or other clear transfer intention because a vehicle is movable property governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; registration under the Motor Vehicles Act is regulatory and does not itself determine title. The registration certificate is evidence of registration for compliance purposes, but it is not a document of title and non-mutation does not defeat an agreed transfer. Where the parties admitted equal contribution and equal ownership, the other party&#039;s half share could not be denied merely because the vehicle remained registered in one party&#039;s name, and the objection based on exclusive registration failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 949 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320</link>
      <description>Ownership of a motor vehicle can pass by sale agreement or other clear transfer intention because a vehicle is movable property governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; registration under the Motor Vehicles Act is regulatory and does not itself determine title. The registration certificate is evidence of registration for compliance purposes, but it is not a document of title and non-mutation does not defeat an agreed transfer. Where the parties admitted equal contribution and equal ownership, the other party&#039;s half share could not be denied merely because the vehicle remained registered in one party&#039;s name, and the objection based on exclusive registration failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>