<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193319</link>
    <description>A motor vehicle is movable property, so its transfer is governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; endorsement of the transfer in the registration record under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is evidence of ownership but not a condition precedent to a valid sale. Failure to intimate the transfer may attract statutory consequences, but it does not invalidate a completed transfer. An insurance policy covering a specified vehicle is a personal contract of indemnity and may lapse on transfer only when a valid transfer is actually proved. On the facts discussed, no reliable proof of an earlier completed sale existed, so the policy remained operative and the insurer remained liable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:21:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 70 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193319</link>
      <description>A motor vehicle is movable property, so its transfer is governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930; endorsement of the transfer in the registration record under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is evidence of ownership but not a condition precedent to a valid sale. Failure to intimate the transfer may attract statutory consequences, but it does not invalidate a completed transfer. An insurance policy covering a specified vehicle is a personal contract of indemnity and may lapse on transfer only when a valid transfer is actually proved. On the facts discussed, no reliable proof of an earlier completed sale existed, so the policy remained operative and the insurer remained liable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>