https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318 A mere agreement to sell a motor vehicle did not transfer ownership because the contractual conditions for sale and transfer remained unfulfilled; the insured therefore continued as owner and the insurer remained liable under the policy. The insurer could not avoid indemnity on the basis of an unlicensed driver because it had to plead and prove a wilful breach of the policy condition, and no such proof was shown. Cross-objections filed by the claimants in the insurer's appeal were held incompetent. The award in favour of the claimants was sustained and the insurer's challenge failed. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:17:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318 A mere agreement to sell a motor vehicle did not transfer ownership because the contractual conditions for sale and transfer remained unfulfilled; the insured therefore continued as owner and the insurer remained liable under the policy. The insurer could not avoid indemnity on the basis of an unlicensed driver because it had to plead and prove a wilful breach of the policy condition, and no such proof was shown. Cross-objections filed by the claimants in the insurer's appeal were held incompetent. The award in favour of the claimants was sustained and the insurer's challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318