<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 393 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318</link>
    <description>The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal found the insurer liable to pay compensation to the claimants as the insurance policy covered the vehicle owner at the time of the accident. The court determined that the transfer of vehicle ownership had not occurred, the driver had a valid license, and the insurer failed to prove a breach of insurance terms. The insurer&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the claimants&#039; cross-objections were deemed incompetent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 393 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318</link>
      <description>The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal found the insurer liable to pay compensation to the claimants as the insurance policy covered the vehicle owner at the time of the accident. The court determined that the transfer of vehicle ownership had not occurred, the driver had a valid license, and the insurer failed to prove a breach of insurance terms. The insurer&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the claimants&#039; cross-objections were deemed incompetent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>