https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193317 Detention orders under Madras Act I of 1947 were held to be reviewable in habeas corpus only on narrow jurisdictional grounds: lack of genuine authority, bad faith or fraud, mistaken identity, or failure to apply the statutory mind to the condition of satisfaction. The Court would not examine the sufficiency or reasonableness of the material supporting executive satisfaction. Section 16-A, inserted by Madras Ordinance II of 1948, was upheld as a valid curtailment of Section 491 CrPC relief for applications filed after its commencement, but it was not applied retrospectively to pending applications. Section 561-A was held not to enlarge the statutory jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:50:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193317 Detention orders under Madras Act I of 1947 were held to be reviewable in habeas corpus only on narrow jurisdictional grounds: lack of genuine authority, bad faith or fraud, mistaken identity, or failure to apply the statutory mind to the condition of satisfaction. The Court would not examine the sufficiency or reasonableness of the material supporting executive satisfaction. Section 16-A, inserted by Madras Ordinance II of 1948, was upheld as a valid curtailment of Section 491 CrPC relief for applications filed after its commencement, but it was not applied retrospectively to pending applications. Section 561-A was held not to enlarge the statutory jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193317